Intensive spatial transformation and restructuring in China these years has brought the separation of residence-job, so as to residence-public services, which adversely affects people’s access and enjoyment of job and public service resources, especially for the disadvantaged populations with limited choice of residence location and insufficient access to those resources. The residents of affordable housing are among the typical disadvantaged populations under the existing affordable housing policy in China. Residence-job separation of affordable housing residents has been paid much attention in literature, but no specific study has been conducted on the residence-public services separation and the behavioral responses of the residents. Spatial mismatch theory was originally put forward to reveal the adverse labor market outcome brought about by residence-job separation, and nowadays some scholars have tried to extend the residence-job spatial mismatch to residence-other resource spatial mismatch. This research responds to both the dilemma facing by the disadvantaged affordable housing residents and the extension trend of spatial mismatch theory. By applying the spatial mismatch theory and taking several affordable housing communities of Hangzhou as examples, the study explore the problems existing in affordable housing in commuting, employment, public service and residents' behavior response. The results found that the current affordable housing policy has led to an increase in commuting costs, a decrease in employment accessibility and welfare, a decrease in accessibility and satisfaction of public services, and disruptive behavior in the affordable housing market. These problems are mainly caused by remote layout and single supply, unreasonable allocation methods, difficulty in exchanging housing units and inadequate supervision of undesirable behaviors. To alleviate the spatial mismatch between housing and resources in Hangzhou, policy suggestions could be considered from four aspects: housing layout and supply, allocation methods, housing exchange and supervision.
Published in | Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.urp.20240902.12 |
Page(s) | 47-57 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Spatial Mismatch, Affordable Housing, Resources, Welfare
[1] | Wang, L., Yang, C. A Study on the Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Residentsjob and Residence in the Public Rental Housing in Chongqing. Human Geography. 2021, 36(05), 101-110. |
[2] | Gao, Y. A Study on the Evolutionary Game of Local Governments' Group Behavior in the Indemnificatory Housing Policy and its Governance Mechanism. China Economic Studies. 2011, (06), 52-56. |
[3] | Du, H. A Review on the Research of Urban Employment and Residential Space. Modern Urban Research. 2015, (06), 127-132. |
[4] | Li, M., Zhou Y. A Study on Measuring the Welfare Effects of Affordable Housing Construction Considering Distributional Inequality. Contemporary Economics. 2016, (36), 145-152. |
[5] | Kain, J. F. Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1968, 82(2): 175-197. |
[6] | Vrooman, J., Greenfield, S. Are Blacks Making It in the Suburbs? Some New Evidence on Intrametropolitan Spatial Segmentation. Journal of Urban Economics. 1980, (7), 155-167. |
[7] | Kasper, H. Measuring the Labor Market Costs of Housing Dislocation. Scottish Journal of Political Economy. 1973, 20(2): 85-106. |
[8] | Lau, C. Y. Spatial Mismatch and the Affordability of Public Transpor for the Poor in Singapore's New Townslyl. Cities. 2011, 28(3), 230-237. |
[9] | Zhang J. “Hangzhou Model” of Public Rental Housing Guarantee. China Real Estate. 2013, (19), 52-55. |
[10] | Liu, Y., Qiu, J. Selective Strategies of Affordable Housing Construction and Itssocio-Spatial Effects in Large Cninese Cities from the Perspective Ofentrepreneurialism. Human Geography. 2018, 33(04), 52-59+87. |
[11] | Liu, Y., He, W. Supply and Demand Characteristics of Public Service Facilities in Social Housing Settlements and its Dynamics in Guangzhou City. Modern Urban Research. 2016, (06), 2-10. |
[12] | Shima, H., Jinat, J., Somayeh, M. Does Location Matter? Performance Analysisof the Affordable Housing Programs with Respect to Transportation Affordability in Dallas FortWorth (DFW) Metropolis. Transportation Research Record. 2018, (3), 194-205. |
[13] | Wang, X., Huang, C., Jiang Y. Suitability Analysis of Residential Space and Demand Preference of Talents Affordable Housing in Big Cities: A Case Study of Nanjing. Modern Urban Research. 2020, (05), 46-53. |
[14] | Wu, H. Optimizing the Path of Comprehensive Security of Public Rental Housing Basedon Accessibility. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences. 2021, (12), 57-64. |
[15] | You, J., Huang, C. The Evolution Process and Countermeasure Research of Affordable Housing in the New Period: A Case Study of Nanjing. Modern Urban Research. 2020, (04), 114-123. |
APA Style
Wang, L., Lin, Z. (2024). Housing-Resources Spatial Mismatch Investigation of Affordable Housing and Policy Implementation: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China. Urban and Regional Planning, 9(2), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20240902.12
ACS Style
Wang, L.; Lin, Z. Housing-Resources Spatial Mismatch Investigation of Affordable Housing and Policy Implementation: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China. Urban Reg. Plan. 2024, 9(2), 47-57. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20240902.12
AMA Style
Wang L, Lin Z. Housing-Resources Spatial Mismatch Investigation of Affordable Housing and Policy Implementation: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China. Urban Reg Plan. 2024;9(2):47-57. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20240902.12
@article{10.11648/j.urp.20240902.12, author = {Liping Wang and Zi Lin}, title = {Housing-Resources Spatial Mismatch Investigation of Affordable Housing and Policy Implementation: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China }, journal = {Urban and Regional Planning}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {47-57}, doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20240902.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20240902.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20240902.12}, abstract = {Intensive spatial transformation and restructuring in China these years has brought the separation of residence-job, so as to residence-public services, which adversely affects people’s access and enjoyment of job and public service resources, especially for the disadvantaged populations with limited choice of residence location and insufficient access to those resources. The residents of affordable housing are among the typical disadvantaged populations under the existing affordable housing policy in China. Residence-job separation of affordable housing residents has been paid much attention in literature, but no specific study has been conducted on the residence-public services separation and the behavioral responses of the residents. Spatial mismatch theory was originally put forward to reveal the adverse labor market outcome brought about by residence-job separation, and nowadays some scholars have tried to extend the residence-job spatial mismatch to residence-other resource spatial mismatch. This research responds to both the dilemma facing by the disadvantaged affordable housing residents and the extension trend of spatial mismatch theory. By applying the spatial mismatch theory and taking several affordable housing communities of Hangzhou as examples, the study explore the problems existing in affordable housing in commuting, employment, public service and residents' behavior response. The results found that the current affordable housing policy has led to an increase in commuting costs, a decrease in employment accessibility and welfare, a decrease in accessibility and satisfaction of public services, and disruptive behavior in the affordable housing market. These problems are mainly caused by remote layout and single supply, unreasonable allocation methods, difficulty in exchanging housing units and inadequate supervision of undesirable behaviors. To alleviate the spatial mismatch between housing and resources in Hangzhou, policy suggestions could be considered from four aspects: housing layout and supply, allocation methods, housing exchange and supervision. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Housing-Resources Spatial Mismatch Investigation of Affordable Housing and Policy Implementation: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China AU - Liping Wang AU - Zi Lin Y1 - 2024/07/15 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20240902.12 DO - 10.11648/j.urp.20240902.12 T2 - Urban and Regional Planning JF - Urban and Regional Planning JO - Urban and Regional Planning SP - 47 EP - 57 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1697 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20240902.12 AB - Intensive spatial transformation and restructuring in China these years has brought the separation of residence-job, so as to residence-public services, which adversely affects people’s access and enjoyment of job and public service resources, especially for the disadvantaged populations with limited choice of residence location and insufficient access to those resources. The residents of affordable housing are among the typical disadvantaged populations under the existing affordable housing policy in China. Residence-job separation of affordable housing residents has been paid much attention in literature, but no specific study has been conducted on the residence-public services separation and the behavioral responses of the residents. Spatial mismatch theory was originally put forward to reveal the adverse labor market outcome brought about by residence-job separation, and nowadays some scholars have tried to extend the residence-job spatial mismatch to residence-other resource spatial mismatch. This research responds to both the dilemma facing by the disadvantaged affordable housing residents and the extension trend of spatial mismatch theory. By applying the spatial mismatch theory and taking several affordable housing communities of Hangzhou as examples, the study explore the problems existing in affordable housing in commuting, employment, public service and residents' behavior response. The results found that the current affordable housing policy has led to an increase in commuting costs, a decrease in employment accessibility and welfare, a decrease in accessibility and satisfaction of public services, and disruptive behavior in the affordable housing market. These problems are mainly caused by remote layout and single supply, unreasonable allocation methods, difficulty in exchanging housing units and inadequate supervision of undesirable behaviors. To alleviate the spatial mismatch between housing and resources in Hangzhou, policy suggestions could be considered from four aspects: housing layout and supply, allocation methods, housing exchange and supervision. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -